Dado Dolabella is sued by the Public Prosecutor’s Office with a debt of half a million.  Understand!

Dado Dolabella is sued by the Public Prosecutor’s Office with a debt of half a million. Understand!


Dado Dolabella was called to pay a debt of nearly half a million. The plaintiff’s defense intends to appeal the case.

html[data-range=”xlarge”] figure image img.img-47b4d54f78b7a88c993dcf5028a4b833qgoeixt7 { width: 774px; height: 455px; }HTML[data-range=”large”] figure image img.img-47b4d54f78b7a88c993dcf5028a4b833qgoeixt7 { width: 548px; height: 322px; }HTML[data-range=”small”] figure image img.img-47b4d54f78b7a88c993dcf5028a4b833qgoeixt7, html[data-range=”medium”] figure image img.img-47b4d54f78b7a88c993dcf5028a4b833qgoeixt7 { width: 564px; height: 332px; }HTML[data-range=”small”] .article__image-embed, html[data-range=”medium”] .article__image-embed { width: 564px; margin: auto 0 30px; }




TO week he turned 43, Dolabella data received bad news. The plaintiff was subpoenaed by the prosecutor to pay, or do a debt agreement nearly half a million.

The value refers to the rent of a property of 320 sqm in Recreio, West Zone of Rio. Given away he would go ten months without paying the amountuntil he was evicted in 2013. The information comes from columnist Lucas Pasin, of UOL.

The Public Prosecutor’s Office suggests that Dado come to an agreement to avoid having his passport and driving license blocked. The court declared civil insolvency in the plaintiff’s case, which is when the debt is worth more than the person’s assets. Sowhoever is a debtor loses the right to administer his assets. In Dado’s case, the administrator will be a lawyer. In the past, the actor he already had assets in pledge due to the debt.

Dado Dolabella’s lawyer makes accusations about the trial

Fernanda Tripode, Dado Dolabella’s lawyer, is awaiting the judge’s analysis of an appeal she presented and hopes to be able to appeal. The practitioner also accused the perpetrator of the debt information disclosure process in order to curb Data.

“The collection of an alleged debt cannot be carried out as the plaintiff did by using the media with a clear purpose of embarrassment, as it entails a result that is considered illicit”, reads the lawyer’s statement, released by the columnist.

Source: Terra

You may also like