Television presenter Tania Llasera faced online backlash after expressing empathy for Lindsay Clancy, an American mother accused of strangling her three young children.
The Spanish journalist removed her original video from social media after thousands of followers condemned her comments regarding the severe pressure and exhaustion experienced by mothers.

In her initial video, Llasera discussed the heavy burden mothers carry in silence to ensure the well-being of their families. She said that many mothers abandon their own needs and experience deep isolation at the end of each day.
Llasera stirred controversy by stating that she felt empathy for a woman who had allegedly killed her three children. She also criticized Clancy's husband, Patrick Clancy, for rebuilding his life with another woman and resuming his routine after the tragedy.
The presenter argued that while the husband went out for brunch with friends and went skiing, maintaining a lifestyle beyond fatherhood, the mother possessed no existence outside of her parental duties. She added that she believed many women identified with that inequality in parenting.
Details of the Massachusetts trial
The case involves Lindsay Clancy, a resident of Massachusetts who was recently placed on trial for the murder of her three children. In January 2023, Clancy strangled her five-year-old daughter Cora, her three-year-old son Dawson, and her eight-month-old son Callan with her hands.
Following the killings, Clancy jumped from the balcony of her home in Massachusetts. Her legal defense team has argued that she suffered from severe psychiatric issues and hallucinations that emerged after her third pregnancy.

Massachusetts is a state located in the northeastern United States. Llasera is a prominent Spanish television presenter and broadcast journalist known for her public commentary on women's issues and family life.
Clarification statement and response
Following the intense wave of criticism, Llasera deleted the video and published a statement to explain her position. She admitted that she found it difficult to understand her own empathy toward a woman responsible for such a horrific act.
Llasera emphasized that feeling empathy did not mean justifying the crime. She stated that attempting to understand the suffering, despair, or darkness that Clancy experienced did not erase the tragedy or the harm inflicted on the children, adding that she deeply condemned any violence against innocent victims.
The journalist stated she was not judging Clancy's guilt, but trying to understand why many mothers on social media, particularly in the United States, felt empathy. She suggested that women recognized the familiar feelings of exhaustion, overwhelm, and extreme loneliness in raising children.
Llasera noted that feeling overwhelmed did not justify extreme actions or mean that all mothers would reach the same outcome. She concluded by stating she was trying to accept that one can feel compassion for a person while feeling immense pain for the victims, offering an apology to anyone offended by her remarks.
